Pre-layout · 4.7 not released

Grok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5
No 4.7 scoreboard yet

Search demand is real. A 4.7 vs Fable 5 winner table is not. This page ranks the query, shows the live 4.6 proxy, and lists what is still rumor.

#Grok 4.7 vs Fable 5#Grok 4.6 proxy#AA 61 vs 62#Unreleased

Scoreboard you can defend

No 4.7 evals

No same-source comparison yet

xAI has not published Grok 4.7 benches. Any “4.7 beats Fable 5” post is speculation.

61 vs 62

Live proxy: 4.6 vs Fable 5

Official Grok 4.6 table: AA Intelligence 61 vs Fable 5 Max 62.

65.9% vs 70%

DeepSWE v1.1

Grok 4.6 65.9% vs Fable 5 Max 70%. Coding still leans Fable.

2.1T quote

The 4.7 claim

Musk: 2.1T, better than 4.6 except slightly slower, more token-efficient. Not a card.

Why this matchup is being searched

Fable 5 is Anthropic’s high-end story. Grok 4.6 already sits one point under it on AA. People assume 4.7’s larger pre-train will close or flip that gap. Until weights and evals exist, the honest page is a tracker plus the 4.6 proxy table.

What the circle is arguing

One camp: 2.1T plus SpaceX data will leapfrog Fable on long agents. Other camp: 4.6 already lost DeepSWE and TB v3.0 to Fable/Sol, so a modest pre-train bump may not flip coding. Neither camp has 4.7 numbers.

Timeline for this query

2026-07-24/28

4.6 and 4.7 teased together; 4.7 described as 2.1T.

2026-08-12

Grok 4.6 ships with a public table vs Fable 5 Max — the only fair numbers today.

2026-08-14

Still no 4.7 card. This URL is for the search, not a fake review.

Known vs unknown

Known (use these in the table)

Since 4.7 is unreleased, Grok 4.6 stands in as the proxy. From the 4.6 launch table, against Fable 5 Max: Artificial Analysis 61 vs 62; GDPVal-AA 1753 vs 1741; CursorBench 69.9% vs 70.5%; DeepSWE 65.9% vs 70%; FrontierCode 61.3% vs 63.6%; Terminal-Bench v3.0 26% vs 34.1%. Note this TB column is v3.0, a different scale from the TB 2.1 used across the DeepSeek tables.

Unknown (leave blank on the 4.7 row)

Grok 4.7 price, context, AA index, DeepSWE, and any Fable 5 head-to-head. Flip this page to a real comparison the day those appear.

How to pick before 4.7 exists

Need Fable-class judgment now

Stay on Claude Fable 5 / Opus 5. The live tables still give Fable the coding edge.

Need cheaper frontier-adjacent now

Grok 4.6 at $2/$6 is the available Grok side of this matchup — not 4.7.

When 4.7 actually ships

This page currently uses real Grok 4.6 numbers as the proxy row. Once xAI publishes an official 4.7 model card and benchmarks, that row will be replaced with 4.7's own figures while the Fable 5 Max and w/ fallback labels stay as they are. Until then, 4.6 scores are never presented under a 4.7 heading.

On QCode

Grok 4.7 has not been released, and QCode does not carry the Grok family. The catalogue does list claude-fable-5 on /models, so the Claude side of this comparison is directly available.

Grok 4.7 vs Fable 5 FAQ

Did Grok 4.7 beat Fable 5?

Nobody can know. Grok 4.7 has no public benchmarks as of 2026-08-14.

Then why have this page?

People already search the exact phrase. A honest tracker outranks a late review — if it refuses fake scores.

What is the closest real comparison?

Grok 4.6 vs Fable 5 Max on the official 4.6 table. Fable leads most coding rows by a little; AA is 62 vs 61.

Will 2.1T automatically beat Fable 5?

Parameter count is not a bench. 4.6 already showed price and turn efficiency can matter as much as a point of AA.

Should I delay a Fable 5 project to wait for 4.7?

Not advisable. Ship on Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.6 now, and revisit once 4.7 has an official model card and same-source benchmarks worth re-testing against.

Are TB v3.0 and TB 2.1 the same?

No. Grok's launch table uses Terminal-Bench v3.0 while DeepSeek's tables use 2.1. They are different scales, and putting them in one "TB" column produces wrong conclusions.

Sources

Sources: the official eval table on x.ai/news/grok-4-6; founder remarks as relayed by July 2026 reporting; Claude Fable 5 pricing from Anthropic's official pricing page. As of 2026-08-14, Grok 4.7 has no official model card or benchmark results.

Compare models that exist

Run the live mix — Fable 5, Opus 5, Grok 4.6, GPT-5.6 Sol — instead of waiting on a rumor row.